
Metropolitan Proximity Index · 17 metro areas of more than one million people
We measured Mexico's 17 metro areas with more than one million inhabitants with the same yardstick, using open data only: how much of everyday life (shopping, studying, caring for others, working, relaxing) each person can reach on foot from home.
01 · How it is measured
From every point of a 100 m grid, we travel the street network for fifteen minutes and count the everyday places within reach. The example is a census tract in Colonia Moderna, Mexico City: the same calculation shown in the demonstration on our home page, repeated 801,620 times across the 17 metro areas.




02 · One scale
The index runs from 0 to 100 and compares each person with the 51 million people measured in the 17 metro areas: an index of 30 means that person can reach fewer everyday places on foot than 70% of them; an index of 80, more than 80%. It is calculated for each of six everyday functions (shopping, learning, care, leisure, repair and work) and averaged. A metro area's index is the average of the people who live there.
An average hides a lot, so each bar shows how a metro area's people are distributed. Across the 17, people are divided into five groups of equal size according to their proximity: from the 20% with the least proximity (dark red) to the 20% with the most (cream). If a metro area looked like the whole set, each color would fill one fifth of the bar; the light lines mark those fifths. Hover over a bar to see the percentages; click to open the metro area in the atlas.
How to read the chart
03 · People and proximity
Each census tract has a density, how many people live per hectare, and a proximity index. Crossing the two across the 17 metro areas reveals two situations that call for opposite responses. The distinction rests on two cut points calculated over the 17 metro areas together, weighted by population:
In the first situation, many people with little proximity, services are missing: daycare, schools, clinics and food stores where people already live. In the second, high proximity with few people, the city can take in more residents without moving them away from everyday life: that is where new housing belongs, before the periphery.
In each metro area
Four metro areas on the map
Each map colors the metro area's census tracts along both axes. Red: many people per hectare and few places nearby. Dark green: many places nearby and few people. The intermediate shades combine both cut points, as the key shows.
04 · What is missing
The overall index summarizes six functions, but they are not all equally scarce. The table shows each metro area's index for each function, from 0 to 100. A darker color means less proximity in that function; the scale is the same for the whole table, so metro areas can be compared with each other, and functions too.
People without the service within a fifteen-minute walk
The index compares positions; these bars count absences: the share of each metro area's population without a single care service (daycare, childcare center, primary health care or social assistance) or a single school within a fifteen-minute walk.
05 · Interactive atlas
Choose a metro area and an everyday function, or the cross of people and proximity. On hover, each census tract shows its population, its index and how many places its residents can reach on foot.
06 · The 17 metro areas
The maps share one scale: the size of each footprint is the real size of the metro area. Choose one to open it in the atlas.
07 · What we found
The six metro areas with the lowest index are in the north: Tijuana (29.6), Juárez (31.1), Mexicali (32.0), Saltillo (37.1), La Laguna (37.6) and Monterrey (39.3).
Ranking by urban density closely resembles ranking by proximity; size barely explains it. San Luis Potosí and León outperform Monterrey, which has four times their population.
In the Guadalajara metro area, the central municipality has an index of 74 and Tlajomulco de Zúñiga, 25; in Querétaro, El Marqués reaches 19. The lowest values recur in mass housing on the periphery and in gated communities.
In Mexico City, households without a car live where more can be reached on foot (667 places, compared with 579 for households with a car); in Tijuana and Juárez they live just as far away as everyone else.
Nezahualcóyotl, with an index of 86, is the municipality with the most proximity across the 17 metro areas: its dense street grid and neighborhood shops outperform any financial district.
Across the 17 metro areas, 2.2 million people live in the densest areas with little proximity; 339,000 of them in Tijuana, 17% of its population.
Use the index as the target and yardstick of urban development programs: bring daycare, primary health care and schools to the areas where the 20% of people in the 17 metro areas with the least proximity live, and make new housing developments conditional on nearby basic services.
How to measure progress: the share of the population within that 20% with the least proximity; today 43% in Tijuana, 34% in Juárez and Mexicali, and 11% in Mexico City.Dense, mixed-use cities keep everyday life within fifteen minutes; sprawling ones have handed it over to the car.
08 · Documents
For your city
The same method works in any municipality in Mexico with open data, and becomes more precise with each government's own records.
Start a project →