CARTOGRAMA
Propose a project

Urban structure analysis

Centres and corridors

Where Cancún's centres and corridors statistically are, how they changed between 2015 and 2026 and whether they match those proposed by current zoning.

In one sentenceCompares real centres with those proposed by the plan, to decide where to recognise or build them.

Spanish original: Centralidades y corredores

Where are Cancún's centres?

Centres are not decreed: they are recognised where they already exist and built where they are wanted.

This atlas identifies them statistically from employment, follows their evolution and contrasts them with the plan's zoning.

Key findings

  • One centre and seven subcentres

    Eight centres hold 32% of employment; the traditional centre concentrates 51,000 jobs, 63% of employment in centres.

  • Peripheral centres grow

    The centre grew until 2020 and fell back in 2026; the airport (×2.4) and the wholesale market (×3.3) are the fastest-growing centres.

  • Zoning and reality

    The plan recognises the centre (72% under centrality keys); 13% of its primary corridor coincides with identified centres, and 83 of 233 km of active corridors are zoned as corridors.

The interactive atlas below is in Spanish. Numbers, maps and controls are the same as described on this page.Open it full screen ↗

DENUE 2015, 2020 y 2026 · Censo 2020 · 325 mil edificaciones · zonificación secundaria vigente · vialidades OpenStreetMap · Getis-Ord Gi*

Approach

  1. Step 1

    Identify centres as clusters of 250 m cells with significantly high employment (Gi* ≥ 3.29, 500 m band) in 2015, 2020 and 2026.

  2. Step 2

    Describe each centre by employment, retail, facilities, residents, built volume and sector diversity.

  3. Step 3

    Measure corridors by establishment density along avenue segments and contrast centres and corridors with the plan's centrality keys.

How to read it

  • The directory records formal establishments; employment is estimated from range midpoints.
  • Centres depend on the Gi* band and threshold; the choice is documented.
  • A centrality key outside a real centre may be a policy bet, not an error.

Data

  • Business directory 2015–2026

    Establishments, sector and employment.

  • 2020 Census

    Population by block.

  • Buildings

    325,000 footprints with area and estimated height.

  • Current zoning

    Secondary zoning key by parcel.

  • OpenStreetMap

    Trunk to tertiary roads.

What you just saw

Spatial statistics of employment (Getis-Ord Gi*) and establishment density by segment.

What else this method can answer

  • Which zoned corridors have no activity?
  • Where is a new centre emerging?
  • How has the structure changed since 2015?

In other places

Needs an employment directory and zoning.

Line of work

D · Territorial diagnosis and monitoring →

Do you have a similar question in your city?

Describe the problem
Next in Urban structure and societyTwelve years of business directory